🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have decided to pull out from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and heated debates in the legislature.

Several thousand of protesters gathered in Riga this past week to voice disagreement with the vote. The ultimate authority now lies with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to approve or veto the proposed law.

Referred to as the European treaty, the 2011 agreement only became active in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and assistance programs to end all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the initial European Union member to initiate the process of withdrawing from the convention. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that rights groups characterized as a major setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Resistance

The treaty was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have argued that its emphasis on equal rights weakens family values and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Latvian parliament, MPs decided 56 to 32 to exit from the treaty, a action proposed by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a setback for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who stood with demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse does not triumph," she stated to the assembly.

Political Divisions and Reactions

One of the main parties supporting the withdrawal is Latvia First, whose leader has called on citizens to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova appealed for the agreement not to be politicized, while the organization Equality Now asserted it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it served as a tool to achieve them".

The Thursday's decision has provoked broad outcry both within the country and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have signed a Latvian appeal demanding the treaty to be preserved. The women's rights organization the rights center has announced a demonstration for the coming week, charging MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Concerns and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body stated that Latvia had made a hasty decision driven by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey left the treaty four years ago, instances of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the vote did not achieve a two-thirds majority, the head of state could possibly return the bill for additional review if he has objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on digital platforms that he would assess the vote according to legal requirements, "taking into account governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political viewpoints".

Recently, another component of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not exclude petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in our nation but across the continent," stated a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse rates have been increasing in multiple EU nations
• The European treaty mandates specific legal protections for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's decision could affect similar debates in other member states